Therapy context
Targets and task context
What the session was working on, at what level, and inside which activity—when that context is audible or stated.
Session Audio → Clinical Evidence → SOAP Draft
RelyCare listens for targets, first attempts, cueing, errors, retries, and self-corrections—then turns session audio into a review-ready SOAP note with the transcript evidence still attached.
Session analysis
Mason R. · Initial /s/
Transcript evidence
SLPFirst try: sun.
MasonThun.
SLPUse your skinny snake sound, then try sun again.
MasonSun.
Atomic observation
/θ/ for /s/ on first attempt
Accurate retry · verbal cue
Target metric
8 / 17
first attempts · 47%
The second shift
Stop rebuilding the session from memory. Start with the draft, then inspect the evidence behind it.
Built for speech-language pathologists and private clinics that want documentation relief without turning clinical review into a black box.
Why SLP-specific matters
Readable prose is not enough when the clinical record depends on which response came first, what support changed it, and where the reported number came from.
Generic conversation summary
“The patient practiced /s/ words and improved with cues.”
It sounds plausible, but it does not tell the reviewer what was independent, what changed after support, or which excerpt supports the conclusion.
RelyCare’s review path
What RelyCare extracts
When the audio supports it, RelyCare looks beyond topic-level summarization and structures the response mechanics an SLP needs to review.
Therapy context
What the session was working on, at what level, and inside which activity—when that context is audible or stated.
Attempt integrity
Independent responses remain distinct from what happened after support, so a successful retry does not rewrite the first attempt.
Response mechanics
Verbal or model cues, repeated attempts, and audible self-corrections are organized into the review path instead of flattened into prose.
Traceable review
Representative errors and transcript excerpts stay close to the observation or metric they support, ready for clinician inspection.
One continuous evidence trail
The point is not to make the model’s answer look certain. It is to keep enough context attached that the clinician can inspect, correct, or reject it.
Transcript
The speaker-labeled excerpt preserves what was actually audible.
Observation
The response is organized by target, context, result, and attempt type.
Support
The cue stays attached to the retry instead of inflating independence.
Retry
The accurate retry is captured separately from the first attempt.
SOAP draft
The clinician can inspect the source while reviewing the Objective section.
Controlled demo · session 04
Mason R. · Articulation · 45 minutes
Review-ready draft
Every section remains editable. The treating clinician decides what enters the final record.
Mason participated in structured word-level articulation practice targeting initial /s/. He remained engaged following inaccurate productions and responded to brief verbal placement cues.
Mason produced initial /s/ accurately on 8 of 17 first attempts (47%) at the word level. Following verbal placement cues (“skinny snake sound”), he produced 7 of 7 documented retries accurately and made 2 spontaneous self-corrections. In one representative trial, “sun” was initially produced as “thun” and was accurate on retry after a verbal cue.
Mason: “Thun.” → after verbal cue: “Sun.”
Transcript linkedMason demonstrated emerging independent accuracy for initial /s/ and strong immediate stimulability with a concise verbal placement cue. The difference between first-attempt and cued-retry performance suggests the target is achievable with support but not yet consistent independently. First attempts and prompted retries should remain separate when interpreting change.
Continue initial /s/ at the word level and advance stable productions into short carrier phrases as clinically appropriate. Fade cues from direct models to brief placement reminders, continue tracking first attempts separately from retries, and provide a short home-practice set using familiar initial /s/ words.
From audio to approved record
Record only with the clinic's consent, privacy, access, and device procedures in place.
Review the transcript, target-level observations, first-attempt counts, cueing, retries, self-corrections, and representative evidence.
Correct the draft, apply clinical judgment, and approve the final record. Raw session audio is deleted after finalization.
Clinical control, where it belongs
These safeguards matter after you have seen the workflow, because they define how the product should be evaluated and used.
RelyCare is designed around what was audibly demonstrated or verbally reported. Eye gaze, posture, silent behavior, and other visual findings require the clinician.
RelyCare prepares a draft. The treating SLP checks the evidence, corrects omissions or unsupported wording, applies clinical judgment, and approves the final record.
Raw session audio is deleted after finalization. Clinics should still evaluate consent, devices, access, exports, and retention procedures during a pilot.
A BAA is available for eligible HIPAA-regulated clinics under the applicable agreement and required operating conditions; a contract alone does not make a workflow compliant.
Common questions
An AI medical scribe for SLPs helps turn speech therapy session context into a documentation draft. An SLP-specific tool should also preserve therapy targets, trials, cueing, errors, corrections, and the evidence a clinician needs to review the result.
No. RelyCare creates a review-ready draft. The treating clinician checks the transcript evidence, corrects errors or omissions, makes clinical decisions, and approves the final record.
No. Audio cannot establish eye gaze, posture, silent behavior, or other visual and physiological observations. RelyCare is designed to limit extraction to what was audibly demonstrated or verbally reported, and clinicians should correct anything unsupported.
A BAA is available for eligible HIPAA-regulated clinics under RelyCare's applicable agreement and operating requirements. A contract alone does not make a workflow compliant; each clinic remains responsible for consent, access controls, devices, exports, and its own HIPAA obligations.
Bring the difficult sessions
Define the sessions, review standard, privacy requirements, and success criteria that matter to your clinic. We will help you evaluate the fit.
Keep exploring
See how the rest of the documentation platform fits together.